feat(review): walkthrough/risk_verdict/test_coverage schema

.opencode/agents/code-quality.md

@@ -68,6 +68,12 @@ Return STRICT JSON only — same shape as the pragent primary's findings:
 }
 ```
 
+The full review-level JSON shape (used by the pragent primary) also
+includes three optional top-level fields — `walkthrough` (list[str]),
+`risk_verdict` (str), and `test_coverage` (str) — that the synthesizer
+fills in across all lenses. Lens output is free to omit them; the parser
+defaults to `[]` / `""` when absent (backward compatible).
+
 `ruleId` examples: `QUALITY_DEAD_CODE`, `QUALITY_HIDDEN_COMPLEXITY`,
 `QUALITY_INVARIANT_DROP`, `QUALITY_NAMING_CONTRADICTS`,
 `QUALITY_SUPPRESSED_ERROR`, `QUALITY_DUPLICATED_LOGIC`. One stable

.opencode/agents/docs.md

@@ -67,6 +67,12 @@ Return STRICT JSON only — same shape as the pragent primary's findings:
 }
 ```
 
+The full review-level JSON shape (used by the pragent primary) also
+includes three optional top-level fields — `walkthrough` (list[str]),
+`risk_verdict` (str), and `test_coverage` (str) — that the synthesizer
+fills in across all lenses. Lens output is free to omit them; the parser
+defaults to `[]` / `""` when absent (backward compatible).
+
 `ruleId` examples: `DOCS_README_DRIFT`, `DOCS_FENCE_BROKEN`,
 `DOCS_ENV_UNDOCUMENTED`, `DOCS_LINK_ROT`, `DOCS_NO_CHANGELOG`. Use one
 stable ruleId per recurring pattern — it's how the synthesizer dedups

.opencode/agents/perf.md

@@ -48,3 +48,9 @@ O(n²) over bounded small n, `low` for redundant-but-rare work.
 ```
 
 `line` must be a post-change line. No prose outside JSON.
+
+The full review-level JSON shape (used by the pragent primary) also
+includes three optional top-level fields — `walkthrough` (list[str]),
+`risk_verdict` (str), and `test_coverage` (str) — that the synthesizer
+fills in across all lenses. Lens output is free to omit them; the parser
+defaults to `[]` / `""` when absent (backward compatible).

.opencode/agents/pragent.md

@@ -160,6 +160,12 @@ containing STRICT JSON, nothing else after it:
   "risks": [
     "Bullets detailing potential bugs, edge cases, lifecycle issues, or performance risks found across the diff"
   ],
+  "walkthrough": [
+    "a.py: adds X — short plain-prose bullet, file- or change-grouped",
+    "b.py: refactors Y"
+  ],
+  "risk_verdict": "Low|Medium|High|Critical risk: <one-line concrete reason>",
+  "test_coverage": "Tests added" | "Tests changed" | "No tests for behavioral change" | "No test files in repo",
   "findings": [
     {
       "severity": "critical|high|medium|low|info|nit",
@@ -178,6 +184,16 @@ Rules:
 - `summary_changes` (2–4 bullets) goes into the **Summary of Changes** section.
   `risks` (bullets) goes into **Key Risks & Concerns**. Both are required;
   empty arrays are fine when nothing applies.
+- `walkthrough` (2–6 bullets, file- or change-grouped) is the **Walkthrough**
+  section: what the PR does, where, in plain prose. Default to `[]` for a
+  trivial diff. Backward compatible — parsers default to `[]` if absent.
+- `risk_verdict` (exactly one line) goes into the **Risk Verdict** section.
+  Lead with `Low|Medium|High|Critical risk:` followed by a concrete reason.
+  Default to `""` when not applicable. Backward compatible.
+- `test_coverage` (short string) goes into the **Test Coverage** section.
+  Use exactly one of `"Tests added"`, `"Tests changed"`,
+  `"No tests for behavioral change"`, `"No test files in repo"`. Default to `""`.
+  Backward compatible.
 - `suggestion` is the literal new code that replaces the flagged line(s). Minimal —
   just the changed lines, indented as they'd appear in the file. Empty string `""`
   when no safe textual replacement exists (e.g. missing test, architectural note).

.opencode/agents/security.md

@@ -51,3 +51,9 @@ security findings only:
 
 `line` must be a post-change (context or `+`) line. Empty `suggestion` when no
 safe replacement. No prose outside the JSON block.
+
+The full review-level JSON shape (used by the pragent primary) also
+includes three optional top-level fields — `walkthrough` (list[str]),
+`risk_verdict` (str), and `test_coverage` (str) — that the synthesizer
+fills in across all lenses. Lens output is free to omit them; the parser
+defaults to `[]` / `""` when absent (backward compatible).

.opencode/agents/tests.md

@@ -48,3 +48,9 @@ replacement); include a sketch only if a one-line test is obvious.
 ```
 
 `line` must be a post-change line in a source or test file. No prose outside JSON.
+
+The full review-level JSON shape (used by the pragent primary) also
+includes three optional top-level fields — `walkthrough` (list[str]),
+`risk_verdict` (str), and `test_coverage` (str) — that the synthesizer
+fills in across all lenses. Lens output is free to omit them; the parser
+defaults to `[]` / `""` when absent (backward compatible).

pilot/ai_review.py

@@ -109,7 +109,10 @@ Output STRICT JSON only — no prose, no markdown fences. Shape:
       "fix": "one line: how to fix it",
       "suggestion": "<exact replacement lines for that location, or empty string if you cannot produce safe replacement code>"
     }
-  ]
+  ],
+  "walkthrough": ["2-6 short bullets, file- or change-grouped, plain prose"],
+  "risk_verdict": "Low|Medium|High|Critical risk: <one-line concrete reason>",
+  "test_coverage": "Tests added" | "Tests changed" | "No tests for behavioral change" | "No test files in repo"
 }
 
 Rules:
@@ -121,6 +124,15 @@ Rules:
   Keep it minimal — just the changed lines, indented as they would appear in the
   file. Leave it empty ("") if a safe textual replacement is not possible (e.g.
   a missing test, an architectural note).
+- `walkthrough`: 2-6 short bullets, file- or change-grouped, plain prose.
+  Default to `[]` when the diff is trivial. Backward compatible: parsers
+  default to `[]` if absent.
+- `risk_verdict`: exactly one line. Lead with "Low|Medium|High|Critical risk:"
+  followed by a concrete reason. Default to `""` when not applicable.
+  Backward compatible: parsers default to `""` if absent.
+- `test_coverage`: short string. One of "Tests added" / "Tests changed" /
+  "No tests for behavioral change" / "No test files in repo". Default to `""`
+  when not applicable. Backward compatible: parsers default to `""` if absent.
 - Skip nitpicks, pure formatting, and praise. At most ~15 findings, highest
   severity first.
 - If the diff is clean, output: {"findings": []}
@@ -728,45 +740,59 @@ def salvage_summary(text: str, max_chars: int = SALVAGE_MAX_CHARS) -> str:
     )
 
 
-def parse_review_output(text: str) -> tuple[str, list[dict], list[str], list[str]]:
+def parse_review_output(
-    """Parse the opengine's stdout into (summary, findings, summary_changes, risks).
+    text: str,
+) -> tuple[str, list[dict], list[str], list[str], list[str], str, str]:
+    """Parse the opengine's stdout into a 7-tuple:
+        (summary, findings, summary_changes, risks,
+         walkthrough, risk_verdict, test_coverage)
 
     Accepts `{"summary": "...", "summary_changes": [...], "risks": [...],
-    "findings": [...]}` (the opencode pragent agent), `{"findings": [...]}`,
+    "walkthrough": [...], "risk_verdict": "...", "test_coverage": "...",
-    or a bare `[...]` of finding dicts. `summary_changes` and `risks` default
+    "findings": [...]}` (the opencode pragent agent), the legacy 4-field
-    to empty lists; older outputs without them still parse fine. Uses the
+    shape, or a bare `[...]` of finding dicts. The three new fields
-    LAST fenced block (the pragent agent emits JSON as the final block), with
+    (`walkthrough`, `risk_verdict`, `test_coverage`) default to empty
-    a tolerant fallback that scans for the last balanced object/array in the
+    list / empty strings when absent — older outputs and the bare-array
-    prose tail. Never raises.
+    shape stay backward compatible.
+
+    Uses the LAST fenced block (the pragent agent emits JSON as the final
+    block), with a tolerant fallback that scans for the last balanced
+    object/array in the prose tail. Never raises.
     """
     blob = _last_json_block(text)
     if blob is None:
-        return "", [], [], []
+        return "", [], [], [], [], "", ""
     try:
         data = json.loads(blob)
     except json.JSONDecodeError:
-        return "", [], [], []
+        return "", [], [], [], [], "", ""
     summary = ""
     summary_changes: list[str] = []
     risks: list[str] = []
+    walkthrough: list[str] = []
+    risk_verdict = ""
+    test_coverage = ""
     findings_raw = None
     if isinstance(data, dict):
         summary = str(data.get("summary", "") or "").strip()
         summary_changes = _string_list(data.get("summary_changes"))
         risks = _string_list(data.get("risks"))
+        walkthrough = _string_list(data.get("walkthrough"))
+        risk_verdict = str(data.get("risk_verdict", "") or "").strip()
+        test_coverage = str(data.get("test_coverage", "") or "").strip()
         findings_raw = data.get("findings")
     elif isinstance(data, list):
         # Bare array: each item is a finding; no summary/sections.
         findings_raw = data
     else:
-        return "", [], [], []
+        return "", [], [], [], [], "", ""
     out = []
     if isinstance(findings_raw, list):
         for f in findings_raw:
             n = _normalize_finding(f)
             if n is not None:
                 out.append(n)
-    return summary, out, summary_changes, risks
+    return summary, out, summary_changes, risks, walkthrough, risk_verdict, test_coverage
 
 
 def _string_list(value) -> list[str]:
@@ -2028,7 +2054,7 @@ def review_pr(
                     compression_note=compression_note,
                     additional_context=additional_context,
                 )
-            review_summary, findings, summary_changes, risks = parse_review_output(stdout)
+            review_summary, findings, summary_changes, risks, _walkthrough, _risk_verdict, _test_coverage = parse_review_output(stdout)
             if not findings and not review_summary:
                 # The findings JSON was missing or malformed. Don't discard the
                 # run: salvage the prose, keep the usage report (the label asked

pilot/opencode_review.py

@@ -905,6 +905,26 @@ def synthesize(
     return deduped[:per_pr_cap]
 
 
+def _synthesize_summary_fields(
+    findings: list[dict],
+    diff: str,
+    changed_paths: list[str] | None = None,
+) -> tuple[list[str], str, str]:
+    """Synthesize review-level meta from the merged findings + diff.
+
+    Returns (walkthrough, risk_verdict, test_coverage) — the three new
+    top-level fields in the pragent review JSON shape
+    (`ai_review.parse_review_output` extracts them as the 5th, 6th, and
+    7th tuple elements, defaulting to `[]` / `""` when missing).
+
+    STUB for Task 7. The real implementation arrives in Task 8; for now
+    every return is empty so the synthesized JSON shape stays parseable
+    and downstream tests that default the new fields to `[]` / `""`
+    continue to pass.
+    """
+    return [], "", ""
+
+
 # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 # Per-lens subprocess + parallel fan-out
 # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -1304,10 +1324,25 @@ def run_lenses_review(
             {k: v for k, v in f.items() if not k.startswith("_")}
             for f in merged
         ]
+        # Synthesize the review-level meta (walkthrough / risk_verdict /
+        # test_coverage) from the merged findings + diff. Real implementation
+        # arrives in Task 8; the stub keeps the synthesized JSON shape stable
+        # so ai_review.parse_review_output can extract the three new fields
+        # (it defaults them to [] / "" when missing — backward compatible).
+        walkthrough, risk_verdict, test_coverage = _synthesize_summary_fields(
+            merged, diff, changed_paths=changed_paths,
+        )
+        synthesized_payload = {
+            "summary": summary,
+            "walkthrough": walkthrough,
+            "risk_verdict": risk_verdict,
+            "test_coverage": test_coverage,
+            "findings": clean_findings,
+        }
         text = (
             f"{summary}\n\n"
             f"## Findings (multi-lens)\n\n"
-            f"```json\n{json.dumps({'summary': summary, 'findings': clean_findings}, indent=2)}\n```\n"
+            f"```json\n{json.dumps(synthesized_payload, indent=2)}\n```\n"
         )
         if merged_usage is not None:
             merged_usage["duration_s"] = round(time.monotonic() - t0, 1)

tests/pilot/test_ai_review.py

@@ -479,9 +479,9 @@ def test_parse_review_output_bare_findings_no_summary():
 
 
 def test_parse_review_output_empty_and_bogus():
-    assert parse_review_output("") == ("", [], [], [])
+    assert parse_review_output("") == ("", [], [], [], [], "", "")
-    assert parse_review_output("no json here") == ("", [], [], [])
+    assert parse_review_output("no json here") == ("", [], [], [], [], "", "")
-    assert parse_review_output('{"findings":[]}') == ("", [], [], [])
+    assert parse_review_output('{"findings":[]}') == ("", [], [], [], [], "", "")
 
 
 def test_parse_review_output_uses_last_json_block():
@@ -565,6 +565,44 @@ def test_parse_review_output_bare_array_at_tail():
     assert len(fs) == 1
 
 
+def test_parse_review_output_extracts_walkthrough_risk_tests():
+    # The 7-tuple shape carries three new top-level fields:
+    # walkthrough (list[str]), risk_verdict (str), test_coverage (str).
+    txt = (
+        "```json\n"
+        "{\n"
+        '  "summary": "x",\n'
+        '  "summary_changes": [],\n'
+        '  "risks": [],\n'
+        '  "walkthrough": ["a.py: adds X", "b.py: refactors Y"],\n'
+        '  "risk_verdict": "Low risk.",\n'
+        '  "test_coverage": "No tests for behavioral change in a.py.",\n'
+        '  "findings": []\n'
+        "}\n"
+        "```"
+    )
+    summary, findings, _changes, _risks, walkthrough, risk_verdict, test_coverage = (
+        parse_review_output(txt)
+    )
+    assert summary == "x"
+    assert findings == []
+    assert walkthrough == ["a.py: adds X", "b.py: refactors Y"]
+    assert risk_verdict == "Low risk."
+    assert test_coverage == "No tests for behavioral change in a.py."
+
+
+def test_parse_review_output_missing_fields_default_empty():
+    # Backward-compatible: the 4-tuple shape still parses fine; the new
+    # fields default to empty list / empty string.
+    out = parse_review_output('{"summary":"x","findings":[]}')
+    summary, findings, _changes, _risks, walkthrough, risk_verdict, test_coverage = out
+    assert summary == "x"
+    assert findings == []
+    assert walkthrough == []
+    assert risk_verdict == ""
+    assert test_coverage == ""
+
+
 def test_scan_balanced_handles_braces_in_strings():
     # The JSON scanner must not be fooled by `{` or `}` inside string literals.
     s = '{"a":"contains { and }","b":1}'

tests/pilot/test_opencode_review.py

@@ -844,7 +844,9 @@ def test_no_surface_response_parses_as_an_empty_review():
     import ai_review
     text, usage = oc._no_surface_response("o/r", "9", "abc12345", 3)
     assert usage is None
-    summary, findings, _changes, _risks = ai_review.parse_review_output(text)
+    summary, findings, _changes, _risks, _walkthrough, _risk_verdict, _test_coverage = (
+        ai_review.parse_review_output(text)
+    )
     assert findings == []
     assert summary  # non-empty, so ai_review does NOT take the salvage branch
     assert "no review surface" in summary.lower()
@@ -854,6 +856,6 @@ def test_no_surface_response_parses_as_an_empty_review():
 def test_no_surface_response_zero_lenses_wording():
     import ai_review
     text, _ = oc._no_surface_response("o/r", "9", "abc12345", 0)
-    summary, findings, _c, _r = ai_review.parse_review_output(text)
+    summary, findings, _c, _r, _w, _rv, _tc = ai_review.parse_review_output(text)
     assert findings == []
     assert "after path filtering" in summary