3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Marcos 8c491a7626 harden(pilot): contain hostile PR content, bound the webhook, fix anchoring
The reviewer runs an opencode agent with `bash: "*": allow` over a checkout of
the PR author's branch, and the pod holds a Gitea Write credential. Those two
facts had no wall between them.

Security
- _build_env now allow-lists the subprocess environment instead of inheriting
  it, so PRAGENT_BOT_TOKEN and WEBHOOK_SECRET never reach the agent. This was
  the live hole: a PR body or an AGENTS.md could ask the agent to `curl` the
  token out, and it had both the value and the tool.
- sanitize_workdir deletes author-controlled agent-instruction files from the
  checkout before opencode starts (AGENTS.md at any depth, CLAUDE.md,
  .cursorrules, a repo opencode.json/.opencode, copilot-instructions.md).
  opencode loads nested AGENTS.md as instructions, so a PR could otherwise ship
  its own system prompt. They are still reviewed, as data.
- The brief fences PR title/body and diff in --- UNTRUSTED --- markers under a
  trust-boundary preamble; the pragent agent, the three lens subagents and the
  review-methodology skill now treat injection attempts as a critical finding
  to report rather than an instruction to obey.
- .pr-review.json is read from the PR's base branch, not the head sha. Its
  `instructions` field is spliced into the reviewer's prompt, so head-ref
  reading let any author rewrite the reviewer's rules. Fields are length-capped.
- Untar rejects escaping symlinks, parent traversal, and writes through a
  planted symlink (tar-slip).
- The image runs as uid 10001 instead of root.

Robustness
- Bounded review concurrency (PRAGENT_MAX_CONCURRENT_REVIEWS, default 2). Each
  review forks an opencode process; a thread per delivery was a fork bomb on a
  burst of labels or Gitea retries.
- An in-flight (repo, index, sha) claim closes the check-then-act race in the
  sha-marker dedupe, where two deliveries a second apart both read "not yet
  reviewed" and both posted.
- Request bodies are capped before being read into memory.

Correctness
- parse_diff_anchors counts a whitespace-stripped blank context line. Skipping
  it desynced the new-line counter for the rest of the hunk and silently
  misplaced every later inline comment in that file.
- post_inline_review's body-only fallback folds the anchored findings into the
  body. It previously posted a summary saying "N inline comment(s) below" with
  no comments and no findings — losing them all on the one path that matters.
- fetch_pr_diff's files-endpoint fallback emits real a// b/ prefixes (so
  changed_files and the anchor parser work on it) and reports both HTTP statuses
  in its error instead of the same one twice.
- The CI workflow template pins PRAGENT_ENGINE=ollama; review_pr defaults to
  opencode, which does not exist on a Gitea Actions runner.

Tests: 68 -> 101, covering each of the above.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01B11e8TZZxJyzHW7jj7KWUN
2026-08-18 04:44:44 +00:00
Marcos c7c6c3edd2 fix(opencode): resolve /usr/local/bin -> /usr/bin opencode path in pod
The npm prefix in the Dockerfile is /usr, so opencode installs to
/usr/bin/opencode (symlink to /usr/lib/node_modules/...), not
/usr/local/bin/opencode. The cluster E2E failed with ENOENT on
/usr/local/bin/opencode. Fix in three places:
- Dockerfile ENV PRAGENT_OPENCODE_BIN=/usr/bin/opencode
- ~/k8s/pragent-webhook.yaml env value
- _opencode_bin() now defensive: if the configured path is missing,
  falls back to shutil.which('opencode') before the linuxbrew last-resort.
- Dockerfile + README deploy notes: containerd import is sudoless via
  the group-readable raw socket (the microk8s ctr wrapper sudo-wraps).

Verified: rebuilt + reimported + rolled out; PR #5 (sha 985061c0) review
posted in-pod via the opencode engine (findings=2 inline=2 ok=True),
summary + 2 [CRITICAL] inline comments with suggestions + refs + sha marker.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-17 23:31:53 +00:00
Marcos 8912f6721b deploy: combined opencode image + k8s + docs
- pilot/Dockerfile: python:3.12-slim + node 20 + opencode-ai@1.3.10 +
  ripgrep + pyright/typescript-language-server/eslint (npm) + ruff (pip).
  Factory + pilot scripts baked at /app. imagePullPolicy: Never (local
  import into microk8s containerd).
- .dockerignore: lean build context.
- ~/k8s/pragent-webhook.yaml: image pragent-webhook:opencode, emptyDir work
  at /tmp/pragent-work, env (PRAGENT_ENGINE, OPENCODE_MODEL, PRAGENT_FACTORY_DIR,
  PRAGENT_OPENCODE_BIN, PRAGENT_WORK_ROOT, PRAGENT_RTK_DIR='', timeout 540),
  resources 200m/512Mi -> 1500m/2Gi. Drops the ConfigMap scripts volume.
- pilot/README-webhook.md + .opencode/README.md: opencode engine section,
  build/import/apply steps, factory guide fixes (parse_review_output, steps).

Image builds (1.62GB, smoke-tested: opencode+LSPs+factory+env all present).
Import into microk8s containerd + apply pending (ctr needs sudo).

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-17 23:11:58 +00:00