# pragent current architecture Status: pilot implementation, September 2026. ## System shape ```text Gitea pull_request webhook │ signed HTTP ▼ webhook_server ── trusted base config ──► review_config │ bounded worker ▼ review_pr facade/orchestrator ├── gitea_client fetch diff, reviews, config; publish review ├── diff_compress reduce prompt context ├── opencode_review isolated checkout + agent execution │ └── model / repo factory (.opencode) ├── review parsing normalize findings + validate anchors ├── feedback persist reactions and derive scores └── langfuse_trace usage, cost, evaluation telemetry ``` ## Seams and responsibilities The external seam is `ai_review.review_pr(...)`: one call represents one review attempt and returns success/skip status. The module is retained as a facade for the CI and webhook callers that already import it. The internal seams are deliberately narrower: - `review_config.repo_enabled(get, ...)` owns the security-sensitive opt-in decision. It receives a transport function, so malformed configuration and failure behavior are deterministic in tests. - `gitea_client.request()` and `GiteaClient` own HTTP authentication, JSON request encoding, timeout, and Gitea URL construction. - `model_client.complete()` owns the legacy Anthropic-compatible request shape. `opencode_review` is the preferred agent adapter and keeps Gitea I/O out of the autonomous process. - `diff_compress`, finding parsing, config filtering, and rendering remain pure transformations. Their callers do not need to know how model or Gitea transport works. - `langfuse_trace` is an optional sink. It is fail-open and cannot change the review result. ## Trust model The review config is read from the PR base branch, never the PR head. The agent checkout is treated as hostile: instruction files are removed, credentials are not inherited, and the agent only returns text to the Python publisher. Python validates finding paths and post-change line anchors before sending comments. ## Observability Langfuse is the operational analytics surface. A trace groups runs by `owner/repo#PR`; generations carry usage and cost basis; evaluation scores and human-feedback scores are attached later. The former SQLite-backed dashboard was removed. SQLite remains only as the feedback/evaluation ingestion store. ## Removed surface The dashboard server, dashboard data module, dashboard tests, dashboard README, and dashboard Kubernetes manifest are intentionally gone. Operators use the Langfuse UI for review trends and cost analysis, and Gitea for review details and configuration changes. Historical design/implementation plans under `docs/plans/` describe the earlier TypeScript framework proposal and are not the runtime architecture.