Three changes from operator feedback:
1. Per-comment � attribution restored on inline comments (operator wants
it back — the PR-level collapsible is collapsed by default, so the
attribution is the visible signal of per-finding cost share).
Hidden only when no _tok_attrib was computed (legacy callers / ollama
path without usage metering).
2. Agent prompt now bounds reads beyond the diff — the single biggest
driver of input-token bloat on long agent loops:
* ≤ 5 file reads beyond the diff for the entire review
* ≤ 80 lines per read (use --offset + --limit)
* ≤ 3 grep calls beyond the diff (prefer rtk grep)
* no re-reads of files already seen
* no directory walks (ls -R, find .)
* honor .pr-review.json:exclude_paths
3. De-generalize cost_model calibration labels. The OBSERVED_RUNS list
referred to `gitea_admin/pragent#7` — a real internal repo path that
blocks commercialization. Replaced with `internal/hardening-PR (16
files, 1020 insertions / 91 deletions)`. The numbers (input/output
tokens, steps, duration) are unchanged — only the labels are
generic.
Tests:
* test_inline_comment_body_with_attribution_line — asserts 🪙 line
shows when _tok_attrib is set
* test_inline_comment_body_no_attribution_no_coin_line — still
verifies the line is hidden when no attribution data
* test_observed_report_prices_every_model — asserts no internal
repo name appears in the rendered report
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
pragent pilot — AI Review bot
A minimal AI code-review bot for Gitea, running as a CI step on the existing
act-runner. This is the pilot — a small, self-contained reviewer that
predates the full pragent framework (whose design lives in
docs/plans/2026-08-04-pragent-design.md). The framework will later absorb
this; until then, this is what runs.
How it works
- You add
pragent-botto a repo and commit.gitea/workflows/ai-review.yml. - On a PR, you add the
AI-REVIEWlabel. - Gitea Actions runs the workflow on the
act-runner; it fetches the PR diff, asksglm-5.2:cloud(on-network via the headroom proxy) to review it, and posts the findings back as a PR review authored bypragent-bot. - Remove the label to stop re-reviews on further pushes.
Fail-open: the job always exits 0 and never blocks CI. Errors become a short "review failed" comment.
Onboard a repo (3 steps)
1. Add pragent-bot as collaborator
Repo → Settings → Collaborators → Add → pragent-bot → permission Write.
(Write is required to post reviews/comments.)
Or via API (with an admin/owner token):
curl -X PUT -H "Authorization: token $OWNER_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"permission":"write"}' \
"http://<gitea-host>:3000/api/v1/repos/OWNER/REPO/collaborators/pragent-bot"
2. Add the PRAGENT_BOT_TOKEN secret
Repo → Settings → Actions → Secrets → New secret → name PRAGENT_BOT_TOKEN,
value = the bot's access token (ask the platform admin; stored mode-600 at
~/.claude/.pragent-bot-token on the admin host).
3. Commit the workflow
Copy pilot/workflow-template.yml into the target repo as
.gitea/workflows/ai-review.yml and commit it. That's it.
Use it
Open a PR (or push to an open one), add the AI-REVIEW label. The review
appears within ~30–90s depending on diff size and model latency.
What's intentionally NOT in the pilot
Deferred to the full framework (by design, see the design doc):
- Attention tiering (trivial/lite/full/oversized) and per-tier cost control.
- Multiple analyzer fan-out over a shared cached prompt prefix.
- Prior-comment synthesis (so each push re-posts; the latest review is tagged with the head SHA so it's easy to spot).
- Inline line comments and status checks.
pragent explain/replay/ analytics JSONL.- A second forge (GitLab) and the provider matrix.
Pieces
| File | Role |
|---|---|
pilot/ai_review.py |
The reviewer script (stdlib only). Single source of truth — fetched at runtime by each repo's workflow. |
pilot/workflow-template.yml |
The Gitea Action consumers copy into .gitea/workflows/ai-review.yml. |
tests/pilot/test_ai_review.py |
Unit tests for the pure helpers (no network). |
Run the tests
cd ~/Projects/pragent
PYTHONPATH=pilot python3 -m pytest tests/pilot/ # if pytest available
# or, without pytest:
python3 - <<'PY'
import os, sys, importlib.util
sys.path.insert(0, os.path.abspath("pilot"))
import ai_review # noqa: F401
spec = importlib.util.spec_from_file_location("t", "tests/pilot/test_ai_review.py")
m = importlib.util.module_from_spec(spec); spec.loader.exec_module(m)
fails = 0
for n in sorted(x for x in dir(m) if x.startswith("test_")):
try: getattr(m, n)(); print("PASS", n)
except Exception as e: fails += 1; print("FAIL", n, e)
print("failed:", fails)
PY
Configuration knobs (env in the workflow)
| Env | Default | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
OLLAMA_MODEL |
glm-5.2:cloud |
Model id passed to the headroom proxy. |
OLLAMA_MAX_TOKENS |
6000 |
Output token cap. |
DIFF_MAX_CHARS |
150000 |
Diff truncation cap (with a noted truncation marker). |
OLLAMA_URL |
http://<model-proxy-host>:8789 |
headroom proxy (tailnet). If the act-runner can't reach the tailnet IP, expose 8789 as an in-cluster Service+Endpoints and set this to the cluster DNS name. |