feat: add reviews content collection

Move all 24 review entries from skills-review/catalog.js +
skills-review/submitted-catalog.js into a typed Astro content collection at
src/content/reviews/. Each entry is a Markdown file with frontmatter for the
review metadata (id, author, focus, wins, improve, extras, name, description)
and a body that holds the 'improved' SKILL.md content.

Re-point scripts/build-skill-review.mjs at the new collection. The generator
reads each .md file, parses its YAML frontmatter, and writes
skill-reviews/improved/{id}/SKILL.md in the same shape the legacy catalog
produced — verified byte-identical via 'git diff --exit-code skill-reviews/'.

The 'name' field is preserved separately from 'id' because two entries
renamed the skill during review (id angular-accessibility-root → name
angular-accessibility; id confectionary-skill-hub → name confectionery-orders).
Without it the generator output would drift on those two files.

Does not yet delete skills-review/catalog.js or submitted-catalog.js —
verify.mjs and the legacy review-desk page both still read them, so they
stay as a mirror until task 16 rewires the page to the collection. Adding a
new submission today requires editing both the .md file (new source of
truth) and the legacy catalog.js (until task 16).

Done-when:
- 24 entries under src/content/reviews/ ✓
- verify.mjs's id:' count assertion still passes ✓
- git diff --exit-code skill-reviews/ clean after regenerating ✓
- astro check passes (22 files: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 2 hints) ✓

Co-Authored-By: Claude Code <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Marcos Paulo
2026-09-05 06:21:58 +00:00
parent f241c5581a
commit db4ae19c0a
26 changed files with 1350 additions and 15 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
---
author: 'Andre Salvo'
description:
'Audit a changed code path for SQL injection. Use when code constructs or
executes SQL, query-builder fragments, or ORM raw queries.'
extras:
'Add an eval with a parameterized query and a dynamic `ORDER BY` allowlist.'
focus:
'Trace user-controlled data to SQL sinks and verify values are parameterized.'
id: 'sql-injection-audit'
improve:
- 'The frontmatter is invalid because an un-keyed line appears inside it; fix
this first so hosts can discover the skill.'
- 'Scope the audit to changed code or named paths by default to avoid an
unbounded repository scan.'
- 'Add language-specific safe/unsafe examples in a reference rather than
expanding the main file.'
name: 'sql-injection-audit'
path: '../submitted-skills/Andre%20Salvo/skills/sql-injection-audit/SKILL.md'
status: 'Fix metadata'
title: 'SQL injection audit'
wins:
- 'Strong threat-model coverage, including identifiers and second-order
injection.'
- 'The report asks for source, sink, and data flow.'
---
# sql-injection-audit
## Inputs
Changed files, branch diff, or a named query path.
## Workflow
1. Find SQL execution sinks and trace request, CLI, external, and stored user
input to them.
2. Confirm values use driver or ORM parameters. For dynamic identifiers, confirm
a finite allowlist maps a user choice to a trusted token.
3. Review raw-query escape hatches and stored procedures.
4. Report only evidenced findings with source, sink, location, impact, and a
safe pattern.
## Rules
- Escaping is not a substitute for parameterization.
- Passing tests are supporting evidence, not proof of safety.
- Do not modify code unless the user asks for a fix.
## Output
Return a findings table and the scope reviewed; say explicitly when a path could
not be traced.