Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
gitea_admin 9379b52334 retire self-CI AI review workflow (central webhook service takes over) 2026-08-17 19:31:43 +00:00
Marcos 0baefad4ad ci: enable pragent pilot self-review on this repo
Adds .gitea/workflows/ai-review.yml so pragent dogfoods its own pilot: PRs
with the AI-REVIEW label get reviewed by pragent-bot.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-17 18:20:52 +00:00
Marcos c4dab0f38a fix(pilot): use correct Gitea raw API path (?ref=main) in workflow template
The previous /raw/branch/main/<path> form 404s on private repos; Gitea's raw
endpoint is /raw/<path>?ref=<ref>. Verified the bot token fetches the script
with the corrected form.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-17 18:20:06 +00:00
Marcos 6f012e9b66 feat(pilot): minimal AI review bot for Gitea Actions
Ships a working pragent pilot ahead of the framework build (design doc
deferred). Single stdlib-only reviewer script fetched at runtime by a per-repo
Gitea Action; reviews fire only on PRs with the AI-REVIEW label; model is
glm-5.2:cloud via the on-network headroom proxy; fail-open.

- pilot/ai_review.py: fetch PR diff, call model, post review as pragent-bot
- pilot/workflow-template.yml: per-repo Gitea Action gated on AI-REVIEW label
- pilot/README.md: onboarding (bot collaborator + secret + workflow + label)
- tests/pilot/test_ai_review.py: 15 unit tests for pure helpers (no network)
- README/design doc: note pilot is the bootstrap; framework build deferred

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-17 18:18:06 +00:00
Marcos 8a4239a9d9 docs: rework design after prior-art review
Red Hat's MIT ai-code-review already implements phases 1-2 (four forge clients,
six providers, CI integration, repo context file). Adds a research writeup,
inserts Phase 0 (evaluate it before building), and folds in seven requirements
the original design missed — chiefly prior-comment synthesis, without which our
own 1.7-runs-per-PR assumption means every push re-posts dismissed findings.

Amends implementation tasks 4, 5, 6, 9, 10 and gates the subagent briefs.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011Ye1KNFMkkUtmzTypHXkoK
2026-08-04 17:27:15 +00:00
Marcos 8d690f5717 docs: add subagent dispatch briefs for phase 1
Per-task briefs a cold subagent can execute without conversation history:
objective, deliverables, constraints, done criteria, likely failure modes.
Adds orchestrator instructions (dependency graph, model tiers, dispatch loop,
stopping conditions), a shared context block, a review gate checklist, and
notes for running the plan on a non-Claude model.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011Ye1KNFMkkUtmzTypHXkoK
2026-08-04 17:21:17 +00:00
Marcos 9b017475c9 docs: add phase 1 implementation plan
TDD task breakdown for the walking skeleton: diff parsing, forge adapter port
with a local git implementation, rules-based tiering, config loading, analyzer
runner behind a ModelClient port, pi SDK client, aggregator, JSONL emitter, CLI.
Later phases recorded as milestones with done-when criteria.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011Ye1KNFMkkUtmzTypHXkoK
2026-08-04 16:40:05 +00:00
Marcos 1c0c576e40 docs: initial pragent design and README
Extensible PR review framework: CLI-in-CI delivery, pi SDK agent loop,
deterministic-plus-LLM tiering, committed repo profile, JSONL/OTel analytics.
Design doc records the decisions, cost model, and rollout phases.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011Ye1KNFMkkUtmzTypHXkoK
2026-08-04 16:35:35 +00:00