Files
pragent/.opencode/README.md
T
Marcos 76b6752f48 fix(review): language-tagged suggestion fence for Gitea syntax highlighting
Gitea 1.26.x has no GitHub-style 'Apply suggestion' button — a ```suggestion
fence is just an unknown-language code block, so chroma does not highlight it
and there is no apply control. Switch inline_comment_body to wrap the suggested
fix in a fence tagged with the file's language (new _lang_for_path helper,
.java→java, .ts→typescript, .py→python, ...), so Gitea syntax-highlights the
code. No capability lost (there was never an apply button on this Gitea
version). Correct the docstrings/skills/README that wrongly claimed an
apply-button was rendered.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-18 01:26:37 +00:00

121 lines
5.4 KiB
Markdown

# pragent `.opencode/` — the review factory
pragent's review runs on **opencode** (the AI-coding-agent CLI). This directory is
a portable **factory**: the `opencode.json` + `.opencode/` are dropped into a
checked-out copy of the target repo at the PR head sha, then `opencode run` is
launched there. The `pragent` primary agent reviews the diff with real tools
(subagents, LSP/linters via bash, webfetch references) and emits a structured
findings JSON. A thin Python shell posts that JSON back to Gitea as inline
comments + language-highlighted suggested-fix blocks + a summary (dedupe + anchor validation stay
deterministic in Python).
## Layout
```
opencode.json provider (headroom → glm-5.2:cloud), model, lsp, permission, default_agent
.opencode/
agents/
pragent.md PRIMARY reviewer — reads .pragent/brief.md, runs linters, emits findings JSON
security.md subagent — injection/auth/secrets/supply-chain lens (dormant)
tests.md subagent — missing/weak test coverage lens (dormant)
perf.md subagent — N+1 / O(n²) / hot-path lens (dormant)
skills/
review-methodology/SKILL.md severity rubric, what to report, anchoring rules
findings-schema/SKILL.md the exact output JSON shape
commands/
review.md /review slash command (local interactive use)
README.md this file
```
## How a review runs
```mermaid
flowchart TD
WH["webhook_server.py<br/>HMAC + AI-REVIEW gate + dedupe"] --> RP["ai_review.review_pr"]
RP --> ARCH["fetch repo archive @ head sha<br/>→ /tmp/pragent-work/<repo>-<sha>"]
ARCH --> BRIEF["write .pragent/brief.md<br/>(title, body, diff, config, prior, sha)"]
BRIEF --> DROP["drop opencode.json + .opencode/ into workdir"]
DROP --> OC["opencode run --pure --agent pragent --dir <workdir><br/>--model headroom/glm-5.2:cloud"]
OC --> PR["pragent primary<br/>load skills · run linters · read code · delegate lenses"]
PR --> JSON["final message: summary + ```json findings```"]
JSON --> PARSE["ai_review.parse_review_output<br/>{summary, findings}"]
PARSE --> ANCHOR["parse_diff_anchors → split_findings"]
ANCHOR --> POST["post_inline_review<br/>summary + inline lang-tagged fix block + ref links + sha marker"]
```
## Lean by default
The `pragent` primary does the whole review in one pass for small/medium diffs
(no subagent calls). It delegates to `@security` / `@tests` / `@perf` subagents
ONLY on large (>~400 lines) or security-sensitive diffs. Token cost scales with
PR size. Subagent recursion is capped by the primary's `steps` budget.
`--pure` is passed at runtime so the reviewer doesn't load the host user's heavy
global opencode plugins (supermemory/dcp/morph/pty) which hang cold-start. In the
deploy pod there's no global config, so `--pure` is a no-op there — but it keeps
host-local runs deterministic.
## Extending the factory
### Add a review lens (subagent)
1. Create `.opencode/agents/<name>.md` with `mode: subagent`, `hidden: true`, a
`description`, and a read-only `permission` (deny edit/write, allow bash/webfetch,
`task: deny` so it can't recurse). The body is its system prompt; end it by
requiring the same findings-JSON shape.
2. Allow it in the primary's `permission.task` list in `pragent.md`:
```yaml
task:
"*": "deny"
"security": "allow"
"tests": "allow"
"<name>": "allow" # add this
```
3. Mention in `pragent.md`'s "Delegate on heavy diffs" step when to invoke it.
That's it — the primary can now `@<name>` it via the Task tool. It stays dormant
(the primary decides when), so adding it costs nothing for small PRs.
### Add a skill
1. `mkdir .opencode/skills/<name> && touch .opencode/skills/<name>/SKILL.md`
2. Frontmatter: `name: <name>` (kebab-case, matches dir), `description:` (specific
enough for the agent to pick it). Body = the knowledge.
3. Refer to it from `pragent.md` ("Call the `skill` tool for `<name>`").
Per-language expertise is free: the host user already has 29 global skills
(golang-*, react-*, k8s, terraform, testing, typescript, …). opencode
auto-discovers them via the `skill` tool — the pragent primary loads a matching
one when the repo's language fits. To ship a pragent-specific one, just drop it
here.
### Change the output shape
Edit `.opencode/skills/findings-schema/SKILL.md` (the schema doc) AND the Python
parser in `pilot/ai_review.py` (`parse_findings`) + the renderers
(`inline_comment_body`, `summary_bullets`, `format_review_body`). Keep them in
sync — the parser is tolerant but the agent and parser must agree on field names.
### Switch model / provider
Edit `opencode.json` `provider` + `model`. The provider points at the on-network
headroom proxy (`http://100.74.17.70:8789/v1`, Anthropic `/v1/messages` format,
`apiKey: ollama`) → `glm-5.2:cloud`. To use a different model, add a provider and
reference it as `<provider>/<model-id>`.
## Local one-shot review (no webhook)
```bash
cd ~/Projects/pragent
opencode run --pure --agent pragent --dir . \
--model headroom/glm-5.2:cloud \
"Read .pragent/brief.md if present, else review \`git diff HEAD\`, and output findings."
```
Or in the TUI: `/review` (uses `.opencode/commands/review.md`).
## Engine flag
`PRAGENT_ENGINE=opencode` (default once wired) uses this factory. `=ollama`
falls back to the legacy direct model call in `pilot/ai_review.py`. The two
share all Gitea I/O, dedupe, and posting logic.