Marcos Paulo e3ce8abe89 test: diff computed styles, because a ported rule can be inert
A media query can sit in the built stylesheet, match the viewport, and do
nothing. Astro scopes a component's rules as
`.tree-node[data-astro-cid-lsutp3lb]`, specificity 0,2,0. A responsive
rule that arrives unscoped as `.tree-node`, 0,1,0, loses to it. The
breakpoint is present, the selector matches, the declaration never wins.

Task 15e attempt 4 shipped exactly that: `@media (max-width: 1050px)
.tree-node { width: 145px }` is in dist and the node stays 180px. The
acceptance test I had written for that task -- diff the breakpoints in
responsive.css against the breakpoints in the built CSS -- passes on it.
Checking that a value appears in a stylesheet cannot catch this; only
asking the browser what it computed can.

This walks both pages at a list of widths and compares computed styles
for every element matching the classes the legacy responsive layer moves
at a breakpoint.

  node .agents/scripts/computed-style-diff.mjs full-guide
  node .agents/scripts/computed-style-diff.mjs full-guide --widths 880,1050

It reports 52 differences on main at 880px and 1050px, before task 15e
changes anything: importing responsive.css into an Astro page never fully
worked, for the same specificity reason. The responsive layer has been
partly inert in the build for as long as it has been imported.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-06 03:29:01 +00:00
2026-09-05 04:29:42 +00:00
2026-09-05 04:29:42 +00:00
2026-09-05 04:29:42 +00:00

AI For Dummies

A lightweight, presentation-style field guide to AI-assisted engineering.

It explains how to combine a strong planning/review model with faster workers, reusable skills, subagent handoffs, Git worktrees, and explicit verification. An interactive field kit compares common behavior skills such as ponytail-lite, caveman, unlazy, research, debugging, and review. The skill-forge workflow covers discovery, triggers, package anatomy, progressive instructions, structural validation, and behavioral iteration. The hands-on lab provides a tiny starter project and copy-ready baseline and skill-enabled prompts for a short side-by-side exercise. An interactive model gearbox separates capability tier from reasoning effort across OpenAI, Claude, and Gemini, and every featured skill links to a pinned source with an approval-first installation prompt.

Run locally

This is a dependency-free static site:

python3 -m http.server 4173

Then open http://localhost:4173.

Verify the content and interaction contracts with:

pnpm run verify

Project structure

  • index.html — default route map and focused chapter navigation
  • full-guide/ — the complete bilingual presentation, with responsive audit overrides
  • styles.css / app.js — editorial visual system and bilingual field-guide interactions
  • responsive.css — interactive diagrams and Full HD-to-4K adaptations
  • docs/references/ — bundled research sources and notes
  • docs/operations-guide.md — canonical SilverBullet operations and skills guide
  • hands-on/starter/ — dependency-free Tiny Tasks exercise
  • hands-on/rules/ — dependency-free Guardrails lab; toggles rule sources into the prompt
  • rules/ — bilingual case study of skills, CLI ratchets, Husky, and PR review
  • skills/ — reusable design and rules-case-study skills, plus an interactive package anatomy explorer
  • skills-review/ — static review desk for submitted skills; its reader vote widget calls the separate vote-service
  • vote-service/ — small Go API + Kubernetes manifests backing the skills-review vote widget (see vote-service/README.md)
  • GATES.md — acceptance ledger for the project

Publishing

The Gitea instance has a Pages Server configured to publish a repositorys pages branch under pages.marcospaulo.dev.br. The intended site address is:

https://netcracker.pages.marcospaulo.dev.br/ai-for-dummies/

If the URL is not available yet, verify that the pages branch exists and that the repositorys pages branch exists. Gitea itself does not provide a built-in Pages server; this setup uses the instances separate Pages Server and Actions deployment path.

For the complete authoring, verification, publication, rollback, worktree, and skill workflow, see docs/operations-guide.md.

Reader voting on the skills-review desk

skills-review/ is static, so its "which draft would you ship?" vote widget calls a separate stateful service — vote-service/, a small Go API on its own pod, one vote per visitor enforced server-side by IP (a MAC address is never visible to a server across the internet, so it cannot be used). See vote-service/README.md for the API, the anti-abuse design, and the build/push/deploy steps; skills-review/index.html sets window.SKILLS_REVIEW_VOTE_API to point at it once deployed.

Research

See docs/references/README.md for official Claude, Codex, and Git documentation. The additional reading path bundles 12 verified articles and guides, including Medium and practitioner sources. See model routing for current provider controls and verified skill sources for commit-pinned provenance.

Rules and enforcement case study

Open /rules/ for a concise walkthrough grounded in the netcracker/interview repository. It shows how AGENTS.md, project-local skills, machine-readable repo ledgers, a UI contract ratchet, lint-staged, Husky, commitlint, specialist verifier agents, and PR review reinforce one another. Every example links to its source file in Gitea, and the page includes a copy-ready prompt for mapping the same layers in another repository.

The implementation patterns are also packaged as project-local skills in skills/. Use editorial-playbook when adding chapters or sections, and rules-case-study when turning repository controls into a source-linked teaching page.

S
Description
A lightweight field guide to AI-assisted engineering workflows
Readme 13 MiB
Languages
Astro 41.9%
JavaScript 20.8%
Python 14.8%
Shell 11%
HTML 7.4%
Other 4%