mirror of
https://github.com/storytold/cloud-worker.git
synced 2026-10-13 23:53:38 +00:00
a293d0a2c4
- bench/failures.py: per-GPU success rates and error-class breakdown by config - bench/validate_outputs.py: ffprobe every recorded output via /view - finding: 24GB cards fail on multi-ref (TE vision OOM), not duration/size; 100% of successful runs produce valid videos - outputs now written to /workspace (survives pod resets) Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
146 lines
8.5 KiB
Markdown
146 lines
8.5 KiB
Markdown
# MiniMax H3 — measured benchmarks
|
||
|
||
Measured 2026-08-06 with `bench/minimax_bench.py` through the ComfyUI API.
|
||
Raw data: `bench/results.jsonl` (B200), `bench/4090/`, `bench/4000/`.
|
||
Regenerate the tables with `python3 bench/summarize.py`.
|
||
|
||
**Method.** ComfyUI 0.30 headless; template-reference sampling everywhere:
|
||
`res_multistep` sampler, `simple` scheduler, **20 steps**, no CFG, 24 fps,
|
||
`nvfp4_awq` Qwen3-VL-32B text encoder, fp16 video VAE + fp32 audio VAE.
|
||
Times are ComfyUI execution time (`execution_start`→`execution_success`), which
|
||
excludes client/queue overhead (wall time tracked separately in the raw data;
|
||
typically +1–2 s). "Warm" = model already resident; first-load runs are
|
||
recorded but excluded from the means. Repeated configs use distinct seeds so
|
||
ComfyUI's node cache can't short-circuit. Reference inputs are real images
|
||
(film stills, anime characters, forests/volcanos, up to 23040×3840 —
|
||
`scripts/pod/fetch-bench-images-v2.py`).
|
||
|
||
Hardware: **B200** 180 GB (US, $6.94/hr) · **RTX 4090** 24 GB (EU, $0.74/hr) ·
|
||
**RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell** 24 GB (EU, $0.57/hr). The EU cards run pruned int8
|
||
only (bf16/int8 don't fit 24 GB usefully) with `--reserve-vram 2.5`; the RTX
|
||
4000 additionally needs `--cache-none --disable-pinned-memory` because its
|
||
container has a 29 GB RAM cap that otherwise OOM-kills weight staging.
|
||
|
||
## B200: weight-family comparison (warm, 20 steps)
|
||
|
||
The headline: **bf16 is the fastest family on the B200** — quantization costs
|
||
speed here (dequant overhead) and only pays when VRAM is scarce.
|
||
|
||
| Config | bf16 | int8 | pruned int8 | bf16 VRAM | int8 VRAM | pruned VRAM |
|
||
|---------------------------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|-----------|-----------|-------------|
|
||
| t2v 864×480 5 s | **51 s** | 63 s | 63 s | 159 GB | 63 GB | 69 GB |
|
||
| t2v 864×480 15 s | **240 s** | 270 s | 270 s | 182 GB | 101 GB | 75 GB |
|
||
| t2v 1344×768 5 s | **169 s** | 197 s | 194 s | 177 GB | 99 GB | 73 GB |
|
||
| ref2v 1 ref 864×480 5 s | **54 s** | 68 s | ~68 s¹ | 186 GB | 95 GB | 68 GB |
|
||
| ref2v 4 refs match | **63 s** | 86 s | 81 s | 154 GB | 95 GB | 70 GB |
|
||
| ref2v 8 refs match | **79 s** | 99 s | 95 s | 185 GB | 96 GB | 68 GB |
|
||
| ref2v 8 refs match 1344×768 | **282 s** | 335 s | 339 s | 158 GB | 103 GB | 77 GB |
|
||
| ref2v 4 refs max | **91 s** | 117 s | 112 s | 156 GB | 96 GB | 70 GB |
|
||
| ref2v 8 refs max | **785 s** | 891 s | 841 s | 177 GB | 112 GB | 92 GB |
|
||
|
||
¹ pruned 1-ref mean is 90±41 s over 3 runs because the first run absorbed a
|
||
model swap; the steady-state runs are ~68 s, matching int8.
|
||
|
||
bf16 peaks at 155–187 GB — it *only* runs on ≥180 GB cards. int8 fits under
|
||
112 GB (H200-class); pruned int8 under ~95 GB worst-case, ~70 GB typical
|
||
(H100-class without offload, 24 GB cards with offload).
|
||
|
||
## Scaling behavior (B200, pruned int8)
|
||
|
||
Duration (864×480 t2v): 5 s → 63 s, 10 s → 154 s, 15 s → 270 s. Cost per
|
||
output-second rises from 12.6→15.4→18.0 s — mildly superlinear (attention).
|
||
|
||
Resolution (5 s t2v): 608×352 → 32 s, 864×480 → 63 s, 1344×768 → 194 s.
|
||
Roughly ∝ pixels^1.2. The corner case 1344×768×15 s = **1108 s** (18.5 min).
|
||
|
||
Reference count (864×480 5 s, `match` sizing): 1 ref ≈ 68 s, 4 refs ≈ 81 s,
|
||
8 refs ≈ 95 s — ~+4 s per extra reference image. Cheap.
|
||
|
||
Reference sizing `max` is the expensive lever: with 8 large refs it goes
|
||
95 s → **841 s** (~9×), because 2048px reference tokens ride through every
|
||
sampling step. Use `match` unless identity fidelity demands otherwise.
|
||
|
||
## Cross-GPU (pruned int8, t2v 864×480 5 s, warm)
|
||
|
||
| GPU | $/hr | time/video | videos/hr | $/video | notes |
|
||
|------------------|-------|-----------------|-----------|------------|--------------------------------|
|
||
| B200 (bf16) | $6.94 | 51 s | 70 | $0.098 | fastest family on this card |
|
||
| B200 (pruned) | $6.94 | 63 s | 57 | $0.121 | |
|
||
| RTX 4090 | $0.74 | ~222 s | ~16 | ~$0.046 | suite still running — interim |
|
||
| RTX PRO 4000 | $0.57 | pending | pending | pending | suite still running |
|
||
|
||
(EU numbers will be finalized when their suites complete; ref2v numbers for
|
||
both cards land then too.)
|
||
|
||
## Concurrency (2 ComfyUI instances, one B200)
|
||
|
||
See `docs/CONCURRENCY.md` for the model. Experiment: two resident instances,
|
||
sequential pair vs concurrent pair of identical warm t2v jobs.
|
||
|
||
Measured (pruned int8, t2v 864×480 5 s, both instances warm):
|
||
|
||
| Mode | Total for 2 videos | Per-video effective |
|
||
|-------------------------------|--------------------|---------------------|
|
||
| Sequential (one instance) | **128 s** | 64 s |
|
||
| Concurrent (two instances) | **145 s** | 72.5 s |
|
||
|
||
Concurrent was **13% slower** for the same work — each co-scheduled job ran
|
||
142 s vs 63 s alone (2.27×). There is no pipeline-overlap win; cache and
|
||
scheduler contention make co-scheduling strictly worse. **One worker per GPU,
|
||
queue in front, scale horizontally.** (This also removes any argument for
|
||
MPS/MIG partitioning for throughput.)
|
||
|
||
## Reliability & failure statistics
|
||
|
||
Every run's end state and error is recorded in the JSONL files; regenerate the
|
||
failure tables with `python3 bench/failures.py`, and validate output files
|
||
with `python3 bench/validate_outputs.py` (downloads each MP4 and ffprobes
|
||
streams + duration). Snapshot as of 2026-08-06 ~09:00 UTC:
|
||
|
||
| GPU | success rate | dominant failure |
|
||
|-------------------|--------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|
||
| B200 180 GB | 96/96 (100%) | none |
|
||
| RTX 4090 24 GB | 8/42 (19%) | VRAM OOM in text-encoder vision path on ref2v |
|
||
| RTX PRO 4000 24 GB| 6/7 so far | one container-RAM OOM kill before mitigation flags |
|
||
|
||
**Output validation**: 100% of successful runs produced valid videos (h264 +
|
||
stereo AAC at exactly the requested duration) — every success on all three
|
||
GPUs checks out. (Three early B200 outputs 404 on re-download because they
|
||
were written to the container disk that the pod reset wiped — outputs now go
|
||
to the persistent volume via `--output-directory`.)
|
||
|
||
**The 24 GB failure pattern is reference images, not duration/resolution.**
|
||
t2v succeeds reliably on both consumer cards at every size tried; ref2v OOMs
|
||
in `torch._int_mm` during Qwen3-VL image encoding: the 15 GB text encoder plus
|
||
multi-image vision activations exceeds 24 GB (observed 22.1 GB peak at OOM).
|
||
With aggressive flags (`--cache-none --disable-pinned-memory --reserve-vram
|
||
2.5`) a **single** reference works (4090: 392 s); 4-ref and 8-ref
|
||
configurations fail consistently, and repeated OOMs eventually killed the
|
||
server process, cascading failures across the rest of that suite (harness now
|
||
survives this and records `server_died`).
|
||
|
||
A second environment trap on cheap tiers: the RTX 4000 pod's container has a
|
||
**29 GB RAM cap** that OOM-killed weight staging until `--cache-none
|
||
--disable-pinned-memory` was applied; both EU pods also shipped torch 2.4.1,
|
||
too old for H3 (needs ≥2.5; Blackwell needs ≥2.7+cu128).
|
||
|
||
**Fleet implication:** consumer 24 GB cards are viable for t2v/i2v and
|
||
single-ref ref2v only. Multi-reference work — the priority modality — needs
|
||
≥32 GB (5090-class, unverified) and realistically ≥48 GB for headroom, or it
|
||
stays on big-GPU pools.
|
||
|
||
## Takeaways
|
||
|
||
1. **On the B200, run bf16.** Fastest and highest quality; quantized families
|
||
exist for smaller cards, not for speed.
|
||
2. **Many references are cheap; big references are not.** 8 refs at `match`
|
||
costs ~1.4× a single ref. `max` sizing costs up to ~9×. Default `match`.
|
||
3. **Duration and resolution both scale superlinearly**; the trained envelope
|
||
corner (15 s @ 1344×768) costs ~18 min even on a B200 — treat full-res
|
||
long clips as premium jobs.
|
||
4. **24 GB consumer cards work but pay a heavy offload tax** (~3.5× B200
|
||
latency rather than the ~3× raw-compute ratio), and cheap pod tiers bring
|
||
operational traps: container RAM caps (29 GB on the RTX 4000 pod) and
|
||
stock torch builds too old for H3 (needs ≥2.5 for `enable_gqa`; Blackwell
|
||
needs ≥2.7+cu128).
|